Sunday, December 29, 2019
Unrestricted Submarine Warfare - Definition Examples
Definition: Unrestricted submarine warfare occurs when submarines attack merchant ships without warning rather than following prize regulations. First used during World War I, this type of warfare was highly controversial and deemed a breach of the rules of war. Resumption of unrestricted submarine warfare by Germany in early 1917 was a key reason the United States entered the conflict. Used again in World War II, it was generally accepted by all combatants though technically banned by the 1930 London Naval Treaty. Examples: World War I: Germany against the AlliesWorld War II: Germany against the AlliesWorld War II: The United States against Japan
Friday, December 20, 2019
Utilitarianism, By Jeremy Bentham And John Stewart Mill s...
1. Utilitarianism is a consequential theory by not only a matter of what we are capable of emotionally doing but to also do a matter of what we ought to do rationally. Actions to benefit the majority to maximize happiness for the greater of good of people and minimize unhappiness. Utilitarian is a hard universal theory for the universal moral code that applies to everyone to maximize happiness and minimize misery or unhappiness for the great of good. In the matter in which peoples consequences are cause not by actions. Two of the well-known philosophers Jeremy Bentham and John Stewart Millââ¬â¢s understand the principle of utility in their own ways. For Jeremy Bentham moral theory he founded that the consequences of human actions count in evaluating in what kind of consequence to what matter for human happiness is just an achievement of pleasure to avoid pain. Bentham argues that the value of a human being action is easily calculated by how intensely pleasure is felt and how long the pleasure lasts to how certainly and how quickly it follows upon the performance of the action taken place for the person. It matters to an account of how to value life in every action the human does to avoid harm to themselves or others. Bentham also used the hedonistic calculus a method of working out the greatest amount of possible alternatives choices in terms of the amount of pleasure to gain and to avoided pain. As Mills theory is an extended explanation of utilitarian moral theory to an effortShow MoreRelatedAn Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation by Jeremey Bentham.1026 Words à |à 5 PagesWhat is Utilitarianism? I believe that utilitarianism is the theory in which actions are right if they produce happiness and wrong if they donââ¬â¢t produce happiness. Happiness is what every human being look forward to. When making a decision, all possible outcomes must be ensured that it will lead to happiness. Utilitarianism is based on the principle of utili ty .Utility is the ability to be useful while satisfying needs. Utilitarianism is generally considered a moral theory that was found by JeremeyRead MoreJohn Stewart Millââ¬â¢s Idea of Utilitarianism ââ¬â Does It Still Exist Today?1255 Words à |à 6 PagesJohn Stewart Millââ¬â¢s Idea of Utilitarianism ââ¬â Does it Still Exist Today? J.S Mill is a philosopher from the 1800ââ¬â¢s, whose work typically seemed to be on the levels of political philosophy. Growing up, Stewart was hugely influenced by Jeremy Bentham as he was Benthamââ¬â¢s god son. This influence proved itself to be an important one as Stewart, just like his god father, began to focus his work around the idea of utilitarianism. In 1863, Stewart had an article called Utilitarianism published in FrasersRead MoreEssay on The Efforts to Regulate the Internet5321 Words à |à 22 Pagestype of problematic sites is anarchistic or terrorist sites, promoting violent protests against whoever or whatever they consider as their enemy. Until recently, those sites were tolerated in the U.S as a ââ¬Å"necessary evilâ⬠resulting from the sacred principle of the freedom of speech. In the post 9/11 era, however, the tolerance towards such web sites has shrunk dramatically. The European Union paper on Illegal and harmful content on the Internet probably best sums up the fears of governments about
Thursday, December 12, 2019
Arranged Marriage In Midnights Children Essay Example For Students
Arranged Marriage In Midnights Children Essay Arranged Marriages in Midnights Children An element of Midnights Children, by Salman Rushdie that I particularly enjoyed was the recurring theme of loving someone in pieces. There are two instances where this is prevalent, one being the interaction between Aadam Aziz and Naseem Ghani. It is stated that: In short: my grandfather had fallen in love, and had come to think of the perforated sheet as something sacred and magical, becausethrough it he had seen the things which had filled up the whole insidehim Through the perforated sheet, Aadam Aziz never saw his bride until he asked for her hand in marriage. Instead, he fell in love with the softness of her ticklish skin, or the perfect tiny wrists, or the beauty of her ankles. Aadam Aziz, who had concentrating on loving the pieces of Naseem, was ill prepared for her presence in its entirety. Naseem and Aadams marriage rapidly dissolved into a place of frequent and devastating warfareunder whose depredations the young girl behind the sheet and the gauche young Doctor turned rapidly into different stranger beings The question, or rather statement made here by Rushdie, is whether or not it is possible to love someone in pieces, without knowing their whole being. When examining the relationship between Naseem and Aadam Aziz, it seems as though Rushdie is stating that one cannot love someone through a perforated sheet, without knowing their soul. Aadam and Naseems marriage became a battleground because they did not have a solid foundation of love to build upon. As a consequence, Naseem employed such tricks as attempting to starve her husband, and Aadam reacted by refusing to eat. Due to the fact that both Naseem and Aadam were quite stubborn, neither one of them refused to concede to one another. It makes one wonder if, for Naseem and Aadam, showing ones true feelings would be to admit defeat. The marriage between Naseem and Aadam never improved, and at the conclusion of Aadams life, as he grew ill, Naseem appeared to thrive on his weakness, which was symbolic of the struggle of their marriage. Another instance of falling in love in fragments, are the interactions between Amina and Ahmed Sinai, as seen in the paragraph below: she began to train herself to love him. To do this, she dividedhim, mentally, into every single one of his component parts, physicalas well as behavioral, compartmentalizing him into lips, and verbaltics and prejudices and likesin short she fell under the spell of the perforated sheet of her own parents, because she resolved to fall in love with her husband bit by bit. In both examples, a husband and wife who shared no love tried to fall in love with each other without truly knowing the other. For Naseem and Aadam, such love never occurred, but for Ahmed and Amina, such love occurred when: Ahmed came to himself under Aminas care, he returned not to the self which had practised curses and wrestled djinns, but to the self he might have been, filled with the contrition and forgiveness and laughter and generosity and the finest miracle of all, which was love. Ahmed Sinai had, at long last, fallen in love with my mother. Therefore, I am uncertain of Rushdies intent in paralleling these two incidents. I believe Rusdies intent in including the magical perforated sheet in the relationship between Naseem and Aadam was to show that their marriage only worked in under such magic. That they could love one another only in pieces, rather than in entirety. The contrast between the two marriages shows that for one set of married couples, fragmented love dissolved under the constraints of marriage, and of true knowledge of the other person. In another case, fragmented love led to complete love. I believe that Rushdies intent is to explore the possibilities of arranged marriage in India, and their possible outcomes. .ub71360b9c291c92d5819a572a8365314 , .ub71360b9c291c92d5819a572a8365314 .postImageUrl , .ub71360b9c291c92d5819a572a8365314 .centered-text-area { min-height: 80px; position: relative; } .ub71360b9c291c92d5819a572a8365314 , .ub71360b9c291c92d5819a572a8365314:hover , .ub71360b9c291c92d5819a572a8365314:visited , .ub71360b9c291c92d5819a572a8365314:active { border:0!important; } .ub71360b9c291c92d5819a572a8365314 .clearfix:after { content: ""; display: table; clear: both; } .ub71360b9c291c92d5819a572a8365314 { display: block; transition: background-color 250ms; webkit-transition: background-color 250ms; width: 100%; opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #95A5A6; } .ub71360b9c291c92d5819a572a8365314:active , .ub71360b9c291c92d5819a572a8365314:hover { opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #2C3E50; } .ub71360b9c291c92d5819a572a8365314 .centered-text-area { width: 100%; position: relative ; } .ub71360b9c291c92d5819a572a8365314 .ctaText { border-bottom: 0 solid #fff; color: #2980B9; font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold; margin: 0; padding: 0; text-decoration: underline; } .ub71360b9c291c92d5819a572a8365314 .postTitle { color: #FFFFFF; font-size: 16px; font-weight: 600; margin: 0; padding: 0; width: 100%; } .ub71360b9c291c92d5819a572a8365314 .ctaButton { background-color: #7F8C8D!important; color: #2980B9; border: none; border-radius: 3px; box-shadow: none; font-size: 14px; font-weight: bold; line-height: 26px; moz-border-radius: 3px; text-align: center; text-decoration: none; text-shadow: none; width: 80px; min-height: 80px; background: url(https://artscolumbia.org/wp-content/plugins/intelly-related-posts/assets/images/simple-arrow.png)no-repeat; position: absolute; right: 0; top: 0; } .ub71360b9c291c92d5819a572a8365314:hover .ctaButton { background-color: #34495E!important; } .ub71360b9c291c92d5819a572a8365314 .centered-text { display: table; height: 80px; padding-left : 18px; top: 0; } .ub71360b9c291c92d5819a572a8365314 .ub71360b9c291c92d5819a572a8365314-content { display: table-cell; margin: 0; padding: 0; padding-right: 108px; position: relative; vertical-align: middle; width: 100%; } .ub71360b9c291c92d5819a572a8365314:after { content: ""; display: block; clear: both; } READ: Mental Health Counseling Essay He may be trying to make the statement that although marriage to someone with whom you are not in love with initially appear undesirable, they may become desirable after a period of time. Another underlying message of Rushdies in creating a parallel between these two instances may be to show that arranged marriages stem from cultural tradition, and that .
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)